Fin

finThis a strong spine

The title is short and the author name has been kept clean and simple.

What makes it stand out on the shelf though is the blaze of white against the red background. It’s a starburst, for Christ’s sake —  one that is presented in the boldest and loudest of colour combinations.

How astute of the designers to resist the temptation to go down the obvious path of depicting a shark fin on the spine. A black fin on a dark blue sea would have achieved little impact on a crowded shelf. The decision to go graphic and play with a multitude of fins has created something much more powerful.

It is decisions like these that make all the difference once a book loses its front-facing presence in store and thereafter has just 2cm X 19cm with which to make its presence felt.


comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

Stitch Head

stitchhead_coverThe most arresting thing about the whole of this lovely cover is the illustration of the main character — it looks both endearing and tragic despite its simplicity. It’s a very wise move of Stripes to give it the prominence it deserves on this spine, as it will draw the eye and appeal to both adults and children. It also makes immediate sense of what would otherwise be a baffling title.

The typography is also a clever choice — unusual enough to attract attention but still legible.

Stripes have also taken the clever decision to give themselves a bold, confident logo that will unify their titles and give their imprint a recognisable identity and appeal across the crowded children’s fiction shelves, as Hay House have done in the MBS market. For a small publisher, this can be a crucial part of establishing loyalty among retailers and consumers alike.

How cheering to see a spine that works hard and looks good.

comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

Hay House Spines

hay-house-spines-1Hay House are in the enviable — and rare — position of having an imprint that actually means something to its market (in this case MBS). The name of Louise Hay and her eponymous list is incredibly influential in this genre.

Rather than letting the logo rest on its laurels, however, Hay have really gone to town on maximising their brand visibility by adding this wave device to all their titles. This is particularly smart at a time when less and less shelf space is being given to this sector — even in a small, crowded section their books now sing from the shelves when displayed spine-out.

Sure, there are inconsistencies of size and colour, due to the variety of the list. But by being the first to make such a bold statement Hay House have reasserted their authority and made their books instantly spottable.

comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

Mister Pip

mr-pipTo all intents and purposes this is a very weak spine.

The typography (which is just about legible on the front cover) is unreadable when placed on its side and reproduced at a smaller size.

Anyone scanning the shelves, expecting the name of the author or title to leap out at them, will be sorely disappointed.

BUT

And it is a big but… this spine does work in a completely different way.

It is such a riot of colour and pattern that it puts every spine around it into the shade.

In an environment where everyone else is working to the same formula of  (1) Title (2) Author (3) Small design icon, this spine takes a very different strategy.

Simply (and quite unapologetically) all it seeks to do is evoke the wonderful richness of the front cover design as a whole.

It is an interesting approach:

For anyone who does not know what the front cover looks like, this spine will fail.

But for grabbing the attention of the nonchalant shelf browser or, more importantly, for an audience who have a vague memory of seeing the Mr Pip cover in a newspaper review or being read on the tube, this is a winner.



comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

The Pale King

the-pale-king-spine-1I have to admit that initially I was really disappointed with this spine. After the understated vibrancy of the front cover (post to follow soon), it felt like a bit of an afterthought.

That’s what I thought while I held the book in my hands… But the minute I put it on a crowded shelf, I saw how wrong I was.

Its width is clearly a big advantage. Rather than cramming it full of noise and colour, Jon Gray has wisely used it to create a wide stripe of calm serenity amidst the on-shelf, spine-out chaos.

Its clean, clear colour means it avoids being recessive — instead it breaks up the shelf and draws the eye:

photo

Really satisfying — and a great example of how important it is to test your spine designs in a real-world context (or even, as I did, on your bookshelf at home or in the office).


comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

1984

1984-penguin-spineThere are so many elements on this spine that it just shouldn’t work. The genius of the design is the holding device of the pipes, which divide the spine into neat sections and so make the hierarchy of information clear.

The variations in fonts and direction of type also help to guide the eye. In the case of 1984, the author and title are of equal importance, so each element is given its own strong identity.

Visually, there is plenty to intrigue the reader. What are the pipes? Where are they leading? And why is one broken? The mechanical eye is a nice variation on the eyes staring out from hundreds of other editions. It gives a real sense of a faceless, futuristic dystopia. It’s also a strong focal point on this busy cover, ensuring stand-out on the shelf.

The whole of this cover is stunning and innovative. We’ll post on the front and back soon…

comment 1 Comment
  • Share/Bookmark

The Robe of Skulls

robe-of-skullsThis is a weak spine. Very, very weak.

There isn’t a single element of it that stands out or grabs attention.

The spindly typeface is illegible.

The author name has been written horizontally so is too small.

The visuals are simply part of a cover wrap so have no significance on the spine.

The foil blocking of the skull (intended to make up the letter O) makes the word even more difficult to read…

..and at this size it doesn’t even look like a skull.

In every way this is a recessive spine.

The best one could hope for is that the designers simply forgot about it but the presence of the foil blocked skull makes us worry that actually they did spend time on it.

If that is the case they need to see it on a bookshelf.

Oh dear.…

comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

Hangman / The Gallows Curse

hangman-spinesWe’ve already featured a series of copycat spines that use the omnipresent ‘Shadow Man Silhouette’ but now we see ‘Hangman Nooses’ are occupying the thoughts of spine designers too.

The problem here is that spine design has got stuck in a rut.

Everyone is working to the same formula of using a small design motif to add a sense of drama to the title.

This is a relatively new trend — if you look at spines from just a decade ago you will find that this (now standard) technique was rarely employed.

Now it has become so over-used that one cannot scan the bookshelves in a store without seeing the same visual icons being used again and again…and again.

The first point to note here, is that it is obvious designers don’t get into stores often enough to see how their designs work in a real sales environment.

The second and more important point is that surely, the time has come for publishers to think afresh about the way they use their spines. When their attempts to stand out actually backfire and make their books look like everyone else’s, there is something going wrong.


comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

Nathaniel’s Nutmeg

nutmegBrave genius or thoughtless stupidity?

Here is a spine that has used grey on white lettering for the title of the book.

It makes it absolutely illegible.

In contrast, however, the author name really pops out of the (seemingly) acres of white space around it.

Now… is this a stroke of insight?

Have the publishers realised that the author is so revered and desired that frankly the most important aspect of designing this spine was to ensure his name leapt out — free from all other distractions (like the title, for instance)?

Surely it was a deliberate and conscious decision to eschew the bright red used for the title on the cover and replace it with a faint colour on the spine.

Or…

Did the designers simply not give it any thought and thereby cock-up?

We know where our money is riding.


Tags:
comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark

Shadow Men: Spines

shadow-men-on-spinesThis is a perfect illustration of why most publishers’ cover development processes are deeply inadequate.

Sure, that shadowy figure on your spine probably looks fantastic on a print-out in the marketing director’s office. But the reality of a crowded shelf is very different. We counted eleven near-identical spines  in a single metre of crime fiction at our local indy — these are just a few of them.

None has anything at all to distinguish it or to catch the eye. Even the big author names lose all their traction. When so much time and effort are spent on front covers, this feels like a terrible waste of talent… and of potential backlist sales.

The cover process needs to change. Get out of the office and put your books on real shelves in real shops. You’ll soon see what you need to do to stand out. And keep going back to test and refine. Talk to booksellers and spend some time watching people browsing your genre. Half an hour of  observation is worth so much more than those agonising hours of cover approval by committee.

Finally, buy everything the competition has to offer and create your own genre shelf in the middle of the department. Make it as messy and chaotic as possible then challenge yourselves to make your spines stand out. Ask visitors and other staff members what they think — and act on their feedback.

As you know, we at Fixabook are nerdy champions of the spine. Creatively and commercially, giving them the attention they deserve can make a massive difference.

comment No Comments
  • Share/Bookmark